Guide to Eminent Domain and Kelo v. City of New LondonThe American Planning Association (APA) supports good planning that helps create communities that offer better choices for residents on where and how people live and work. To achieve good planning, communities often use a variety of tools that assist in implementing comprehensive master plans to guide a community's development. Kelo v. City of New London (No. 04-108) Synopsis This case questions what constitutes a valid "public use" when a municipality exercises its power of eminent domain and condemns private property. Property owners appealed to the Supreme Court, seeking to overturn a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the City of New London's decision to purchase their homes through eminent domain for economic development purposes. The central question of the case is whether the use of eminent domain solely for economic development purposes is a valid public use. Read the Supreme Court decision (pdf) Read Justice Kennedy's concurring opinion (pdf) Read the dissenting opinion (pdf) Read Justice Thomas's dissenting opinion (pdf) Three powers of government Government has the power to:
Eminent domain One of many tools used by communities to implement comprehensive plans. It authorizes local or state governments to take or claim private property for "public use." Usually, eminent domain is used to acquire land to build or expand a highway, airport or revitalize a depressed neighborhood. The value is determined by third-party appraisers, not the government. Fair market value Eminent domain requires that displaced property owners must receive fair market value for their property. Meaning, that they receive a sum of money for their property that they would receive if they were selling the property in a competitive and open market. Blight An area with conditions in disrepair and deterioration, typically designated through standards and processes created through state enabling statutes. Uses for eminent domain Eminent domain has typically been used for economic development, revitalize blighted neighborhoods and expand government services for the community. Some previous examples of eminent domain use include:
Public use To apply eminent domain, the resulting use of the property must be for a public use. Courts historically assumed that "public use" should be defined broadly: public ownership, use by the public, or public benefit or advantage. APA's Amicus Brief APA filed an amicus brief, or "friend-of-the-court brief," to weigh in on the impact eminent domain has on planning communities of lasting value. In its brief, APA urged the justices to maintain the current standard for public use in eminent domain matters involving economic development and not limit the use of the tool to only blighted properties. APA did not support the idea that further judicial involvement was necessary to review cases of eminent domain before a community could proceed. Call to Action APA recommends the following to ensure the continued development of communities that enrich people's lives:
APA's Redevelopment Policy Guide This Policy Guide establishes policies that will increase planners' effectiveness in formulating and implementing redevelopment policies and programs. Redevelopment generally involves the improvement of an area that was developed at some time in the past but presently suffers from real or perceived physical deficiencies such as disinvestment, underused facilities, or environmental contamination. In other cases it deals with land that was developed for uses that have become obsolete or inappropriate as a result of changing social or market conditions. | ||