Trails, Lanes, or Traffic: Valuing Bicycle Facilities with an Adaptive Stated Preference Survey
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 41(4): 287-301, 2007
By: David Levinson, Elsevier, Kevin Krizek, Nebiyou Tilahun
http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/179949/TrailsLanesOrTraffic.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Report a broken linkactive transportation
This article found that cyclists will trade travel time to use segregated bicycle facilities. The authors evaluated individual preferences for five different cycling environments by trading off a better facility with a higher travel time against a less attractive facility at a lower travel time. The tradeoff of travel time to amenities of a particular facility informs our understanding of the value attached to different attributes. The facilities considered here are off-road facilities, in-traffic facilities with bike-lane and no on-street parking, in-traffic facilities with a bike-lane and on-street parking, in-traffic facilities with no bike-lane and no on-street parking and in-traffic facilities with no bike-lane but with parking on the side. Using an adaptive stated preference (ASP) survey of 167 randomly recruited individuals who rated photographic images of different facilities, the authors find that respondents are willing to travel up to twenty minutes more to switch from an unmarked on-road facility with side parking to an off-road bicycle trail, with smaller changes associated with less dramatic improvements.