Planning Magazine

Billions at Stake as Lawsuits Challenge Voter-Approved Transit Projects

Cities like Nashville and Austin face political roadblocks to major public transit expansions, despite surging popularity.

Article Hero Image

Nashville voters greenlit a $3.1 billion plan to expand transit and reduce sprawl, but a state court ruling has placed new restrictions on funding use. Photo by Jeremy Poland/E+/Getty Images.

Opponents are turning to legal challenges to try to block or delay major public transit expansions — even after voters approve them.

Recent lawsuits in Arizona, Tennessee, and Texas have attempted to slow voter-passed projects.

In Nashville, Tennessee, voters passed a $3.1 billion referendum in November 2024 to raise the city sales tax half a cent and fund expanded bus service, pedestrian improvements, and 54 miles of "all-access" transit corridors. But a Tennessee court, while upholding most of the project, ruled in April that the city could not use the funds raised to purchase land for affordable housing or parks.

The ruling affects only 1 percent of the total revenue, the court says. But it was a signal that even well-funded, voter-backed transit efforts are vulnerable to some legal roadblocks.

After voters in Maricopa County, Arizona, last year approved an extension of a half-cent sales tax for transportation, the county GOP sued to try to invalidate the results, arguing the vote didn't meet a 60 percent supermajority.

In Austin, Texas, a 2024 class-action lawsuit attempted to block the city from collecting property taxes unless it excludes a tax approved by voters in 2020 to fund Project Connect — a major transit expansion. But a judge dismissed the lawsuit late last year.

Public support for expanded transit is surging across the U.S. In 2024 alone, voters approved 46 of 53 transit-related ballot measures, unlocking over $25 billion in new funding for transit projects and improvements, according to the American Public Transportation Association.

Despite support at the ballot box, cities often face legal, zoning, and political barriers.

Nashville, in particular, is becoming a case study in both momentum and resistance to transit investment and development, according to researchers at the Urban Institute.

"There's been a sea change," says Gabe Samuels, a research analyst in the Housing and Communities Division at the Urban Institute. "Nashville had two failed transit referenda in the past decade. This time, it passed decisively. Voters want alternatives to sprawl and traffic."

TOD KnowledgeBase Collection
TOD: What You Need to Know

Learn more about transit-oriented development (TOD) with policy guidance, model codes, and toolkits in this KnowledgeBase Collection.

But transit-oriented development — the strategy of clustering housing and businesses near high-quality transit — is often hindered by outdated zoning, say Samuels and colleague Yonah Freemark.

According to an Urban Institute study, more than 90 percent of Nashville's residential land is zoned for single- or two-family homes, a pattern common in Southern and Midwestern cities. That zoning limits the density needed to support high transit ridership, the report says. Currently, 13 percent of Nashville's housing lies within a quarter mile, what the report calls easy walking distance, of its planned transit corridors.

"You're investing millions — sometimes billions — into transit systems," says Freemark. "If you're not thinking about land use and density alongside that, you're wasting the opportunity."

Robbie Sequeira is a staff writer for Stateline. This story was reprinted with permission from States Newsroom, a national nonprofit news organization focused on state policy.

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES